title

Bat in the flat - people's reaction and further actions (results of a sociological survey)

author(s)

Igor Merzlikin (orcid: 000-0001-8209-9144)

affiliation

Sumy State Pedagogical University (Sumy, Ukraine)
Mikhailivska Tsilyna Natural Reserve (Sumy, Ukraine)

bibliography

Theriologia Ukrainica. 2021. Vol. 22: 151–156.

DOI

language

Ukrainian, with English summary, titles of tables, captures to figs

abstract

The salvation of some animal species, including of bats, depends not only on the adoption of laws on the protection of these species at a state level, but also on the attitude of the general public towards them at a household level. Faced with a bat, a person will act according to a certain stereotype, which has already been formed and which is associated with their perception of this animal. Therefore, we tried to find out what people do in a situation when a bat flies into their flat and what are their actions to remove this animal from the flat, as well as what emotions bats evoke in them. A total of 503 students of grades 5 to 10 in Sumy City and district centres of Sumy Oblast were interviewed. Of them, 16.9 % (85) responded that they witnessed cases of bats entering their flats. We provide data on the location and people’s reactions. In 5.9% of cases (5), bats were found in the morning in the room where people slept and then they were released from the balcony. In 94.1 % of cases (80), the animals entered in the evening and were flying in the room. In 34.2 % (26) of cases the animals were allowed to fly independently and the windows were opened, while in most occasions (47.3 %, 36) they were guided out using various tools. At the same time, in 14.5 % cases (11) bats were killed or seriously injured either occasionally or intentionally. In addition, 9.2 % (7) were killed by domestic cats. In 5.3 % of all cases (4), bats died in the shelters. Three individuals (3.9 %) were captured and kept at home for a few days, after which they were released. That is, 27.2% (22 individuals) of the animals reliably died. Almost 60 % of the students think that for whatever reasons bats are capable of attacking humans, get entangled in their hair or bite them. There is a widespread lack of positive perception of bats among both schoolchildren and their parents. All this indicates the need for further popularization of bats among the general public and the search for new ways to convey information. Obviously, the emphasis should be placed not only on their «usefulness», but also on their attractiveness, defencelessness, and vulnerability. This would change the attitude towards these animals in the mass consciousness and thus give them an additional chance to survive.

keywords

bats, bat in the flat, animal conservation, environmental education.

references

Collado, S., R. Rodriguez-Rey, M. A. Sorrel. 2021. Does beauty matter? The effect of perceived attractiveness on children’s moral judgments of harmful actions against animals. Environment and Behavior. May 18: 1–29.
Godlevska, L.V. 2012. Results of the work of the bat contact-centre (Ukraine). Scientific Notes of Taurida V. I. Vernadsky National University. Series: Biology, chemistry, 25 (64, No 4): 12–20. https://doi.org/10.15407/ptt2015.13.011
Godlevska, L. 2015. Results of the Work of the Kyiv Bat Contact-Centre in 2012–2015. Proceedings of the Theriological School, 13: 11–19. [In Ukrainian]
Golenko, A. 2010. The work of the Centre for bat rehabilitation in Kyiv Zoo in 1999–2010. Proceedings of the Theriological School, 10: 175–178. [In Ukrainian] https://doi.org/10.15407/ptt2010.10.175
Gunnthorsdottir, A. 2001. Physical attractiveness of an animal species as a decision factor for its preservation. Anthrozoos, 14: 204–215. https://doi.org/10.2752/089279301786999355
Kingston, T. 2016. Cute, creepy, or crispy — how values, attitudes, and norms shape human behavior toward bats. Bats in the Anthropocene: Conservation of Bats in a Changing World, 571–595. https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/28130
Klebl, C., Y. Luo, N. P.-J. Tan, J. T. Ping, E. B. Bastian. 2021. Beauty of the Beast: Beauty as an important dimension in the moral standing of animals. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 75: 101624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101624
Knight, A. J. 2008. «Bats, snakes and spiders, Oh my!» How aesthetic and negativistic attitudes, and other concepts predict support for species protection. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 28 (1): 94–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.10.001
Prilutskaya, A. S., A. S. Vlaschenko. 2013. Materials on the distribution of bats based on the results of the work of the contact center in Kharkov. Biological Systems, 5 (4): 532–537. [In Russian]
Rebrov, S. V. 2014. Research and protection of bats in the Luhansk region: (results of the work of the regional center of the UTSOK). Scientific Search for Young Researchers. Luhansk, No. 5: 146–151. [In Ukrainian]
Sevillano, V., S. T. Fiske. 2019. Stereotypes, emotions, and behaviors associated with animals: A causal test of the stereotype content model and BIAS map. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 22 (6): 879–900. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430219851560
Stokes, D. L. 2007. Things we like: human preferences among similar organisms and implications for conservation. Human Ecology, 35: 361–369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-006-9056-7
Tribe, A., P. R. Brown. 2000. The role of wildlife rescue groups in the care and rehabilitation of Australian fauna. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 5 (2): 69–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/10871200009359180
Tyshchenko, V., V. Negoda. 2001. Activities of the bat rehabilitation center at the Kyiv Zoo. Current issues of study and conservation of biological diversity (Proceedings of the student conference). International Solomon Univ., Kyiv, 37–39. [In Ukrainian]
Varzareva, V. G. 2010. Attitudes towards bats of various social groups. Plecotus et al., 13: 99–103. [In Russian]
Zagorodniuk, I. 2018. A game against natural selection? Hibernation of migratory bat species in their summering range in Eastern Ukraine. Theriologia Ukrainica, 16: 111–119. https://doi.org/10.15407/pts2018.16.111