title

Characteristics of limiting factors affecting the state of hunting resources of Ukraine

author(s)

Igor M. Sheihas (http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4018-0133)

affiliation

Steppe Branch of G. M. Vysotsky Ukrainian Research Institute of Forestry and Forest Melioration (Oleshky, Ukraine)

bibliography

Theriologia Ukrainica. 2021. Vol. 21: 141–151.

DOI

language

Ukrainian, with English summary, titles of tables, captures to figs

abstract

The abundance of game animals that are in a state of natural freedom, as a natural resource of national importance, is the result of a number of different factors, which are divided into three main groups according to their origin and functional role. The feeding potential and the quality of protective features of habitats of wild animals are the main biotic factors determining the category of value of a particular kind of land, which should theoretically form the quantitative state and structure of aboriginal populations of animals and birds. Although direct dependence between the quality of hunting grounds and the abundance of faunal components of the biocoenosis was not revealed. A comparative classification of hunting grounds was carried out in accordance with the class of bonitet within the natural zones. It is determined that the low actual level of efficiency of national hunting in the research area does not correspond to the high average indicators of value categories (creditworthiness) of lands. At the same time, a significant additional role of the professional hunting approach to hunting management is observed. The highest profitability of hunting is where the highest level of intensity and quality of hunting management measures, in particular protection and biotechnical measures, are applied. Own observations confirmed by the analysis of state statistical reporting indicate the potential for biotechnological improvement of the value category of lands. In farms where wildlife management measures are regularly performed, the abundance of predators is controlled, measures against illegal hunting are carried out, as well as other anthropogenic factors are controlled, in particular where chemicals and environmental management of agriculture and forestry are observed, additional feeding sources for game animals is provided. In such farms, hunting performance indicators (achieving optimal numbers and the degree of use of hunting resources) are higher than in other farms with a similar natural potential. It has been established that, in addition to the quality of land, the following influencing factors have a limiting effect on the quantitative and qualitative state of populations of the main game species: anthropogenic factors such as illegal hunting and low professional level of hunting; biotic factors such as predation by wolves. The effect of other factors having a negative impact is not limiting.

keywords

hunting resource, wild animals, influencing factors, category of value of hunting grounds, illegal hunting, predation by wolves

references

Delehan, I. 2012. Specifics of age determination in some even-toad ungulates (Cerviformes) during field census. Proceedings of the Theriological School, 11: 6–12. [In Ukrainian] https://doi.org/10.15407/ptt2012.11.006
Kozorez, A. I. 2009. Winter distribution of ungulates in forest hunting grounds in the northeastern part of Nalibokskaya Pushcha. Natural resources of the National Park "Pripyatsky" and other specially protected natural areas of Belarus: collection of scientific papers. Minsk, 284–287. [In Russian]
Melnyk, A. 2020. The jackal conquers Europe. Forest and Hunting Journal, No. 1: 34–37. [In Ukrainian]
Melnyk, A. 2021. A stray threat. Forest and Hunting Journal, 2: 38–40. [In Ukrainian]
Instruction 2002. Instruction of the Arrangement of Hunting Grounds. The State Forestry Committee of Ukraine. Kyiv, 1–113. [In Ukrainian]
Instructions... 2008. Game economy (Chapter 7). Guidelines for Farming in the Lower Dnipro forests. Approved by the Academic Council of UkrNDILGA on March 12, 2008. Kharkiv, 51–54. [In Ukrainian]
Novikov, R. 2020. Pulse of the industry. Performance indicators of the hunting economy of Ukraine (Prepared with the support of the Department of Hunting and Hunting of DALRU. Forest and Hunting Journal, № 3: 22–25. [In Ukrainian]
Recommendations ... 1993. Recommendations for determining the actual and optimal number of ungulates in Polissia of Ukraine. Collection of Recommendations on Forestry and Protective Afforestation. UkrNDILGA, Kharkiv, 57–73. [In Ukrainian]
Rizun, E., V. Bondarenko. 2016. Trends in population dynamics of the Ukrainian game mammal fauna and propositions on improvement of its census. Proceedings of the Theriological School, 14: 34–40. [In Ukrainian] https://doi.org/10.15407/ptt2016.14.034
Rizun, E. 2017. Census of game mammals on hunting grounds (a review of methods). In: Zagorodniuk, I. (ed.). Mammal census: data collection and processing. Ukrainian Theriological Society, NAS of Ukraine. Kyiv, 121–132. (Series: Novitates Theriologicae; Pars 10). [In Ukrainian]
Sablina, TB 1955. Ungulates of Belovezhskaya Pushcha. Proceedings of the AN Severtsev Institute of Animal Morphology (Moscow), 15: 15–19. [In Russian]
Sheihas, I. N. 2004. Unification of the basic professional criteria of carrying out hunting works. Journal of Hunting (Moscow), 1 (3): 323–324. [In Russian]
Sheihas, I. M. 2005. Types of hunting lands that provide maximum forage and protective living conditions for wild phytophagous animals in the Southern steppe of Ukraine. Scientific Bulletin of UkrDLTU, 15 (1): 102–107. [In Ukrainian]
Sheihas, I. 2019. A resource we lose. Forest and Hunting Journal, № 1: 29–31. [In Ukrainian]
Sheihas, I. 2011. The wolf! ... Who is he? A perfect carnivore killing machine or just a creature that has the right to live next to a human? Forest and Hunting Journal, No. 6: 32–35. [In Ukrainian]