abstract |
Various
methods are used to identify representatives of
the genus Sylvaemus, most of which are metric. In
order to exclude anomalies in further calculations
and to minimize allometric variations associated
with the growth of animals, it is necessary to take
into account age as an important factor of variability.
Usually, a number of criteria are used to determine
the age and describe the growth of mice: measurements
of body and skull parameters, body weight, the degree
molar wear, and the weight of the lens of the eye.
Length is a more consistent guide for determining
the age of mice than body weight, which usually
ceases to be directly related to age after reaching
adult size. Age can also be determined by the fusion
of the epiphysis with the diaphysis in the bones
of the limbs and by the degree of development of
the thymus. Most often, teeth are used to determine
age. Among such age criteria, we distinguish eruption
and replacement of teeth sets, tooth growth in length,
overgrowth of the tooth pulp cavity, tooth wear,
and annual layers in the tooth tissues. Usually,
the age of mice is determined by the degree of molar
wear. Some authors do not consider this method universal
due to individual feeding habits of animals and
other environmental factors. The order of wear of
tooth rows can sometimes change, and the degree
of wear of the right and left tooth rows can also
differ. The craniological collection of small mammals
of O. V. Zorya, collected in the territory of Kharkiv
Oblast, Ukraine, was studied. In total, 198 specimens
of three species of the genus Sylvaemus were analysed:
Sylvaemus uralensis, Sylvaemus sylvaticus, and Sylvaemus
tauricus. Analysed were 14 odontometric and 23 craniological
characters. Among the metric characters, four odontometric
(LM2, WM1, LM2, LM123) and nine craniological characters
(LIOC, LD, LFI, LPP, WCH, GLS, DI, LLM, LM) made
the greatest contribution to the age group differentiation
of mice of the genus Sylvaemus. Among the features
that contributed the most to the differentiation,
length measurements prevailed. LLM, LM123, LPP,
LIOC, and GLS are the least variable metric characters.
It is not possible to divide the sample of mice
of the genus Sylvaemus into age groups based on
odontometric and craniological character since the
ranges of values of metric characters overlap. |
references |
Adamczewska-Andrzejewska,
K. A. 1967. Age reference model for Apodemus flavicollis
(Melchior, 1834). Ekologia Polska, Seria A, 15 (41):
787–790.
Andrzejewski, R., A. Liro. 1977. Effect of different
kinds of feed on wear of the teeth in individuals
of a field mouse population. Acta theriologica,
22 (29): 393–395. https://doi.org/10.4098/AT.arch.77-41
Ancillotto, L., E. Mori, G. Sozio, E. Solano, S.
Bertolino, D. Russo. 2017. A novel approach to field
identification of cryptic Apodemus wood mice: calls
differ more than morphology. Mammal review, 47 (1):
6–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/mam.12076
Balciauskiene, L., L. Balciauskas, J. R. Mazeikyte.
2004. Sex- and age-related differences in tooth
row length of small mammals: mice. Acta zoologica
Lituanica, 14 (3): 54–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/13921657.2004.10512592
Barciova, L., M. Macholan. 2009. Morphometric key
for the discrimination of two wood mice species,
Apodemus sylvaticus and A. flavicollis. Acta zoologica
Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae, 55 (1): 31–38.
Barkaszi, Z. 2018. Sibling mice species of the genus
Sylvaemus Ognev, 1924 (Mammalia, Rodentia) in the
Ukrainian Carpathians. The Journal of V. N. Karazin
Kharkiv National University. Series Biology, 31:
59–71. https://doi.org/10.26565/2075-5457-2018-31-7
Brown, L. E. 1969. Field experiments on the movements
of Apodemus sylvaticus L. using trapping and tracking
techniques. Oecologia, 3: 198–222. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00379159
Canady, A., L. Mosansky, M. Hybelova, P. Pavelkova.
2014. Morphometric variability of Apodemus uralensis
in Slovakia (Rodentia: Muridae). Lynx, n. s. (Praha),
45: 5–14.
Canady, A., L. Mosansky. 2015. Craniometric data
of Apodemus sylvaticus in Slovakia. Biologia, 70
(7): 974–981. https://doi.org/10.1515/biolog-2015-0105
Dapson, R. W. 1968. Reproduction and age structure
in a population of short tailed shrews Blarina brevicauda.
Journal mammalogy, 49: 205–214. https://doi.org/10.2307/1377976
Dapson, R. W., J. M. Irland. 1972. An accurate method
of determining age in small mammals. Journal of
Mammalogy, 53 (1): 100–106. https://doi.org/10.2307/1378830
Demeter, A., P. Lazar. 1984. Morphometric analysis
of field mice Apodemus: character selection for
routine identification (Mammalia). Annales Historico-Naturales
Musei Nationalis Hungarici, Budapest, 76: 297–322.
Dische, Z., E. Borenfreund, C. Zelmenis. 1956. Changes
in lens proteins of rats during aging. Archives
of Ophthalmology, 55: 471–483. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.1956.00930030475003
Freudenthal, M., E. Martin-Suarez, N. Bendala. 2002.
Estimating age through tooth wear. A pilot study
on tooth abrasion in Apodemus (Rodentia, Mammalia).
Mammalia, 66 (1): 275–284. https://doi.org/10.1515/mamm.2002.66.2.275
Frynta, D., M. Zizkova. 1992. Postnatal growth of
wood mouse (Apodemus sylvaticus) in captivity. Pragus
Studies in Mammology, Charles University Press,
Praha, 57–69. [In English]
Frynta, D., P. Mikulova, E. Suchomelova, J. Sadlova.
2001. Discriminant analysis of morphometric characters
in four species of Apodemus (Muridae: Rodentia)
from eastern Turkey and Iran. Israel journal of
zoology, 47 (3): 243–258. https://doi.org/10.1560/UN22-P31P-PHKD-8D6X
Hagen, B. 1956. Alterbestimmung an einiger Muriden-Arten.
Zeitschrift fur Saugetierkunde, 21: 39–43.
Hagen, A., N. Chr. Stenseth, E. Ostbye, H. J. Skar
1980. The eye lens as an age indicator in the root
vole. Acta Theriologica, 25 (4): 39–50. https://doi.org/10.4098/AT.arch.80-4
Jojic, V., J. Blagojevic, M. Vujosevic. 2011. B
chromosomes and cranial variability in yellow-necked
field mice (Apodemus flavicollis). Journal of Mammalogy,
92 (2): 396–406. https://doi.org/10.1644/10-MAMM-A-158.1
Jojic, V., V. Bugarski-Stanojevic, J. Blagojevic,
M. Vujosevic. 2014. Discrimination of the sibling
species Apodemus flavicollis and A. sylvaticus (Rodentia,
Muridae). Zoologischer Anzeiger, 253: 261–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcz.2014.02.002
Klevezal, G. A. 2007. Principles and methods of
age determination of mammals. KMK Scientific Press,
Moscow, 1–285. [In Russian]
Kuncova, P., D. Frynta. 2009. Interspecific morphometric
variation in the postcranial skeleton in the genus
Apodemus. Belgian Journal of Zoology, 139 (2): 133–146.
Lashkova, E. I., I. I. Dzeverin. 2002. Odontometric
variation and species identification of wood mice
Sylvaemus (Muridae, Rodentia) from Ukraine fauna.
Vestnik zoologii, 36 (3): 25–33. [In Russian]
Michaux, J. R., R. Libois, M. G. Filippucci. 2005.
So close and so different: comparative phylogeography
of two small mammal species, the yellow-necked fieldmouse
(Apodemus flavicollis) and the woodmouse (Apodemus
sylvaticus) in the Western Palearctic region. Heredity,
94: 52–63. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.hdy.6800561
Miller, G. S. 1912. Catalogue of the mammals of
Western Europe. London, XV, 1–1019.
Morris, P. A. 1972. A review of mammalian age determination
methods. Mammal Review, 2 (3): 69–104. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2907.1972.tb00160.x
Niethammer, J. 1969. Zur frage der introgression
bei den walmausen Apodemus sylvaticus und A. flavicollis
(Mammalia, Rodentia). Zeitschrift fur Zoologische
Systematik und Evolutionsforschung, 7: 77–127. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0469.1969.tb00850.x
Panzironi, C., G. Cerone, M. Cristaldi, G. Amori.
1993. A method for the morphometric identification
of southern Italian populations of Apodemus (Sylvaemus).
Hystrix, the Italian Journal of Mammalogy, 5 (1-2):
1–16.
Reutter, B. A., J. Hausser, P. Vogel. 1999. Discriminant
analysis of skull morphometric characters in Apodemus
sylvaticus, A. flavicollis, and A. alpicola (Mammalia;
Rodentia) from the Alps. Acta theriologica, 44 (3):
299–308. https://doi.org/10.4098/AT.arch.99-28
Sozio, G., V. Curini, I. Pascucci, C. Camma, M.
Di Domenico. 2018. A new fast real-time PCR method
for the identification of three sibling Apodemus
species (A. sylvaticus, A. flavicollis, and A. alpicola)
in Italy. Ecology and evolution, 8: 4807–4814. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4026
Steiner, H. M. 1968. Untersuchungen uber die variabilitat
und bionomie der gattung Apodemus (Muridae, Mammalia)
der Donau-Auen von Stockerau (Niederosterreich).
Zeitschrift fur wissenschaftliche Zoologie, 177:
1–96.
Steiner, H. M., J. Raczynski. 1976. Wiederholbarkeit
von messungen und individueller messfehler bei craniometrischen
untersuchungen an Apodemus. Acta Theriologica, 21:
535–541. https://doi.org/10.4098/AT.arch.76-47
Tupikova, N. V. 1964. The study of reproduction
and age composition of the population of small mammals.
Methods for studying natural foci of human diseases.
Medicine, Moscow, 154–208. [In Russian]
Vukicevic-Radic, O., T. B. Jovanovic, R. Matic,
D. Kataranovski. 2005. Age structure of yellow-necked
mouse (Apodemus flavicollis Melchior, 1834) in two
samples obtained from live traps and owl pellets.
Arch. Biol. Sci., Belgrade, 57 (1): 53–56. https://doi.org/10.2298/ABS0501053V
Zagorodniuk, I. V., K. Yu. Kavun. 2000. Age-related
variation as basis for emergence of interspecific
differences in rodents (Muriformes). Reports of
the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 3:
174–180. [In Ukrainian]
|
