назад на попередню сторінку

Theriologia Ukrainica
(former Proceedings of the Theriological School)

ISSN 2616-7379 (print) • ISSN 2617-1120 (online)

2019 • Vol. 17 • Contents of volume >>>


download pdfNykonenko, A. Impact of the plant cover on patterns of European roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) bed-sites distribution. Theriologia Ukrainica. 2019. Vol. 17: 80-87.


 

title

Impact of the plant cover on patterns of European roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) bed-sites distribution

author(s)

Nykonenko, A.

affiliation

Oles Honchar Dnipro National University (Dnipro, Ukraine)

bibliography

Theriologia Ukrainica. 2019. Vol. 17: 80-87.

DOI

http://doi.org/10.15407/pts2019.17.080

   

language

English, with English & Ukrainian summary

abstract

Research on hoofed mammal species such as the roe deer is of great importance for scientific-based biodiversity conservation actions and population management. Animal ecology studies have fundamental significance for the development of protected areas. The roe deer is a convenient model object for studying population ecology of ungulates by revealing adaptations to the environment and determining the spatial structure of populations. The aim of the present work is to describe the ecological patterns of bed-site selection by the European roe deer in natural forest biotopes located in the Dnipro-Oril Nature Reserve, steppe zone of Ukraine. European roe deer bed-sites were counted during all three autumn months in 2017. Tree and shrub species within a radius of 3.6 m around a bed-site (n = 87) were determined. Duff depth and grass cover height around to the bed-sites were measured. The research was conducted in three different types of ecosystems: pine forest, oak forest, and locust plantations. Shrubs create visual protection of bed-sites in oak forests, while in pine forests visual protection is provided by high grass. Roe deer select places for beds mostly at a distance of 1.5–3.0 m from trees and shrubs, although they may use sites for rest either closer to the plants (20–30 cm) or at a distance more than 3.5–5.0 m. The average distance to the nearest tree exceeds that to shrubs. Duff depth of 1.5–4.5 cm and grass height of 10–75 cm were found right around the bed-sites. We noticed several signs of foraging near the bed-sites, but the tendency of separating places for feeding and rest was demonstrated. Selection of resting sites is influenced by a set of indices of trees and shrubs as well as by grass and other objects providing visual protection. At the same time, the roe deer are prone to have visual control over the surroundings from their bed-sites. The index of environmental protection is calculated as a distance on which the bed-site disappears in an observer’s field of view from all four cardinal directions. This index is 3.7 m on average and varies in different biotopes: 4.1 m in pine forest, 2.8 m in oak forest, and 3.6 m in locust plantations. Trees and shrubs have the best protection properties, while grass cover hides the bed-sites at greater distances. Biodiversity conservation managers should be aware of environmental characteristics required for the species’ existence. Studying habitat selection patterns of animals allows conservation and creation of favorable ecosystems.

keywords

Сapreolus сapreolus, vegetation, defensive behavior, habitat selection, Dnipro region.

   

references

Babayev, E. A., G. Z. Mirzoev. 2011. Peculiarities of roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) bed site selection in the conditions of foothill Dagestan. Proceedings of the Dagestan State Pedagogical University. Natural and Exact Sciences: Biology, 10 (4): 67–72. (In Russian)
Belgard, A. L. 1971. Steppe forestry. Forest Industry Press, Moskva, 1–336. (In Russian)
Chen, H., F. Li, L. Luo, H. Wang, J. Ma, F. Li. 1999. Winter bed-site selection by red deer Cervus elaphus and roe deer Capreolus capreolus in forests of northeastern China. Acta Theriologica, 44: 195–206. https://doi.org/10.4098/AT.arch.99-17
Cindy, L., E. Thomas, J. Morrell, C. Devos. 2001. Diurnal Bed-Site Selection of Urban-Dwelling Javelina in Prescott, Arizona. The Journal of Wildlife Management, 65 (1): 136–140. https://doi.org/10.2307/3803286
Gallina S. 2010. Daytime bedsite selection by the texan white-tailed deer in xerophyllous brushland. North-Eastern Mexico Journal of Arid Environments, 74: 373–377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2009.09.032
Jiang, Z. W., L. Xu, Y. Q. Wang, P. R. Jiao, H. F. Liu. 1996. Winter resting site selection by roe deer at Huzhong, Daxinganling Mountains, northeastern China. Zoological Research, 17: 403–410.
Latham, J., B. W. Staines. 1999. Comparative feeding ecology of red (Cervus elaphus) and roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) in Scottish plantation forests, Journal of Zoology, 24 (2): 409–418. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7998.1999.tb01003.x
Linnell, J. D. C., P. Nijhuis, I. Teurlings, R. Andersen. 1999. Selection of bed-sites by roe deer Capreolus capreolus fawns in a boreal forest land­ scape. Wildlife Biology 5: 225–231. https://doi.org/10.2981/wlb.1999.027
Mysterud, A. 1995. Bed-site selection by European roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) in southern Norway during winter. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 73 (5): 924–932. https://doi.org/10.1139/z95-108
Mysterud, A. 1996. Bed-site selection by adult roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) in southern Norway during summer. Wildlife Biology, 2: 101–106. https://doi.org/10.2981/wlb.1996.038
Sokolov V. E., A. A. Danilkin. 1981. Siberian roe deer. Ecological aspects of behavior. Nauka, Moskva, 1–144. (In Russian)
Timofeeva, E. K. 1985. Roe deer. University of Leningrad Print, Leningrad, 1–224. (Series: Life of our Animals and Birds; Vol. 8). (In Russian)


 


to main page of journal >>>

created: 16.06.2019
updated: 12.12.2019

Locations of visitors to this page