abstract |
The status of ‘stray’ and ‘feral’ dogs that form permanent all-season packs in the territory of the Holosiivskyi Forest, which is part of the Holosiivskyi National Park, is considered. The classification of dog groups by the degree of feralisation is presented and cases of registration of packs in the Park and in the adjacent recreational areas and edges of urban development are described. Seven series of encounters of dog packs are described, mainly in the western part of the Park, within the segment ‘Exhibition Centre—Observatory—Didorivka Lake’, supplemented by information about other areas. In the area of the lake, a den was found in May 2022, where numerous traces of litters were observed, which were absent in subsequent years. The majority of dogs in all packs (where it was visible) are chipped and fattened; they form groups that ignore people and are active only when approaching them, especially in their resting places. |
references |
Albrecht, G. A. 2016. Exiting the anthropocene and entering the symbiocene. Minding Nature, 9 (2): 14–16.
DUL, 1970. Brodiachyi [Vagrant]. In: Bilodid, I. K. (ed.).Dictionary of the Ukrainian language: in 11 volumes. Volume 1. Naukova Dumka, Kyiv, 238.
Gompper, M. E. 2013. The dog–human–wildlife interface: assessing the scope of the problem. In: Gompper, M. E. (ed.). Free-Ranging Dogs and Wildlife Conservation. Oxford University Press, 9–54. ISBN 978-0191810183
Høgåsen, H. R., C. Er, A. Di Nardo, P. Dalla Villa. 2013. Free-roaming dog populations: A cost-benefit model for different management options, applied to Abruzzo, Italy. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 112 (3–4): 401–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2013.07.010
Smith, L. M., L. M. Smith, S. Hartmann, [et al.]. 2019. The effectiveness of dog population management: a systematic review. Animals, 9 (12): 1020 (1–30).
Korobchenko, M. A. 2007. Rabies zoonosis in wild and synanthrope mammal communities in the eastern part of Ukraine. In: Biodiversity and the role of animals in ecosystems: Materials of the IV conference. DNU Publishing House, Dnipro, 486–488. https://www.zoology.dp.ua/z_07_270.html
Lescureux, N., J. D. C. Linnell. 2014. Warring brothers: The complex interactions between wolves (Canis lupus) and dogs (Canis familiaris) in a conservation context. Biological Conservation, 171: 232–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2014.01.032
Lord, K., M. Feinstein, B. Smith, R. Coppinger. 2013. Variation in reproductive traits of members of the genus Canis with special attention to the domestic dog (Canis familiaris). Behavioural Processes, 92: 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2012.10.009
Mishta, A. V. 2007. Mammals of Holosiivskyi forest and adjacent territories. In: Melnychuk, D. O. (ed.). Ecology of Holosiivskyi Forest. Collective monograph. National Agrarian University. Phoenix, Kyiv, 154–173. [In Ukrainian]
Sheihas, I., I. Tymoshchuk. 2012. How pets turn into strays due to our callousness and negligence. Forestry and Hunting Journal, No. 6: 28–29. [In Ukrainian]
Zagorodniuk, I. 2003. Wild mammal fauna of the Kyiv city and its vicinities, and trends in its urbanization. Vestnik zoologii, 37 (6): 29–38. [In Ukrainian] https://shorturl.at/ehioW
Zagorodniuk, I., S. Kharchuk. 2022. Spontaneous fauna: concepts and criteria of its delineation (on the example of the mammal fauna of Ukraine). Novitates Theriologicae, 13: 5–19. [In Ukrainian] https://doi.org/10.53452/nt1311
Zhyla, S. 2006. Wolfs and wild dogs: comparative ecology, behavior, and management. In: Zagorodniuk, I. (ed.). Fauna in the anthropogenic environment. Luhansk, 75–80. (Series: Proceedings of the Theriological School; Vol. 8). https://shorturl.at/aikX5 |